MrsDearDelmar said:Wow, how'd ya get him to admit that??? Great pick Poly!!!
Carver said:Ya'll seem to take a lot of pleasure in being derisive towards those that I had thought we were commanded to love. Why is that? Am I reading Scripture totally wrong?
What about it? It says what it says. It doesn't take away from the fact that we are to hate evil.Carver said:Okay, how about the next verse?
Romans 12:10
Love one another with brotherly affection; outdo one another in showing honor.
So we are to hate Christian evil and love non-Christian evil. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.But anyway, even verse 10 is irrelevant here, because until verse 17 it is talking about how Christians should behave towards Christians.
Carver said:I once knew a lady named Poly
Who seemed to be quite pure and holy
But my post, she ignored
Perhaps she was bored
I'll never know, I guess I'll eat a canole
Yes, we are to hate evil, but you seem to take it to a whole new level and hate the evil-doer as well. Hopefully I am misinterpreting your zeal.Poly said:What about it? It says what it says. It doesn't take away from the fact that we are to hate evil.
Who said anything about loving non-Christian evil. Until a non-Christian becomes a Christian, their acts of evil, however great or small, and most definitly however disgusting they may be to certain Christians, are simply irrelevant. Jesus did not say, "Go and perfect the world that they might be Christians." He said, "Go and make disciples of all nations." First get them to Christ, and Christ takes care of the rest.So we are to hate Christian evil and love non-Christian evil. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.
Yes, and he tells us to rebuke the brother who does evil. But when he says 'brother,' he's talking about fellow Christians. He's saying that if a fellow Christian goes astray, we should correct him, and rebuke is the method he seems to endorse. However, non-Christians, as they are not brothers or sisters in Christ, don't yet qualify for our rebuke. I'm not saying we should be thrilled that BB, or anyone else, is a homosexual. But focusing on the homosexuality and rebuking it is only appropriate if they are a Christian falling away. With non-Christians, homosexual or not, our focus should be getting them to Christ, and let Christ worry about their sins.Evil is evil...period. Paul is talking about how Christians are to act and he tells us that Christians are to hate evil.
And perhaps I figured you hadn't seen it, and wanted to bump it up the list so that you might.Or perhaps she didn't see it.
Again, I knew it got overlooked, so I gave it one last chance to be looked at, and apparently, it was.I realize that you feel that what you have to say is so important around here that there's no possible way that it could get overlooked but newsflash sometimes posts get overlooked at times, even yours.
Can't, don't know where they make them in MN. I used it only because it rhymed (well, sort of). Not too many things rhyme with Poly.Now go eat your canole.
Her name used to be Polycarpadvo, as in Polycarp advocate, and Polycarp has a short o.Carver said:Can't, don't know where they make them in MN. I used it only because it rhymed (well, sort of). Not too many things rhyme with Poly.
Carver said:Yes, we are to hate evil, but you seem to take it to a whole new level and hate the evil-doer as well. Hopefully I am misinterpreting your zeal.
The word brother isn't in that verse. It is a general admonition to Christians. He tells us to abhor evil and cling to what is good.Who said anything about loving non-Christian evil. Until a non-Christian becomes a Christian, their acts of evil, however great or small, and most definitly however disgusting they may be to certain Christians, are simply irrelevant. Jesus did not say, "Go and perfect the world that they might be Christians." He said, "Go and make disciples of all nations." First get them to Christ, and Christ takes care of the rest.
Yes, and he tells us to rebuke the brother who does evil. But when he says 'brother,' he's talking about fellow Christians.
He's saying that if a fellow Christian goes astray, we should correct him, and rebuke is the method he seems to endorse. However, non-Christians, as they are not brothers or sisters in Christ, don't yet qualify for our rebuke. I'm not saying we should be thrilled that BB, or anyone else, is a homosexual. But focusing on the homosexuality and rebuking it is only appropriate if they are a Christian falling away. With non-Christians, homosexual or not, our focus should be getting them to Christ, and let Christ worry about their sins.
Then why did acuse me of ignoring it?And perhaps I figured you hadn't seen it, and wanted to bump it up the list so that you might.
Again, I knew it got overlooked, so I gave it one last chance to be looked at, and apparently, it was.
Can't, don't know where they make them in MN. I used it only because it rhymed (well, sort of). Not too many things rhyme with Poly.
Turbo said:...and folly. :shocked:
You were doing so well,Poly said:I borrowed this one for my extremely poor limerick above.
Turbo said:You were doing so well,
till the end when it fell
...apart.