Ask Mr. Religion
☞☞☞☞Presbyterian (PCA) 	
Gold Subscriber
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
A thread for PPS and myself to drive a few things to ground related to some particular sacred theology proper topics in hopes of edification and glorifying God.
Background...
An Olive Branch (AMR):
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4222285#post4222285
A Welcomed Response (PPS):
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4224234#post4224234
Let's begin, PPS.
As I understand your posts on the topic, it seems to me your basic thesis statement is as follows:
1. God is a singular transcendent hypostasis underlying an ousia.
2. God's literal Logos and Pneuma are the two-fold, singular, external, economic procession of His hypostasis into creation when / as He spoke to create.
3. Each (Logos and Pneuma) are qualitatively, rather than quantitatively distinct.
Rather than start too much beforehand, I need to know if I have accurately captured your basic starting premise. Have I?
AMR
Background...
An Olive Branch (AMR):
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4222285#post4222285
A Welcomed Response (PPS):
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4224234#post4224234
Let's begin, PPS.
As I understand your posts on the topic, it seems to me your basic thesis statement is as follows:
1. God is a singular transcendent hypostasis underlying an ousia.
2. God's literal Logos and Pneuma are the two-fold, singular, external, economic procession of His hypostasis into creation when / as He spoke to create.
3. Each (Logos and Pneuma) are qualitatively, rather than quantitatively distinct.
Rather than start too much beforehand, I need to know if I have accurately captured your basic starting premise. Have I?
AMR