Saved.One.by.Grace
New member
Pat Robertson hosts the 700 Club on CBN, and it's probably shown on many other stations besides. At his age, most men have retired. But Pat continues on preaching the Word, as he sees it. His conservative take on most issues would be consistent with most conservatives here. I said most not all. Maybe I should have said some. He's a strong advocate of Israel of which I'm in agreement with him. He believes in a post-tribulation rapture where he and I disagree. I don't have a problem with that. He answers questions from the audience from index cards or letters written in. Some of his answers are way off, but his staff manages to rein him in, most of the time. He frequently has guests on who profess miracles in their lives. Who am I to argue since I've been the recipient of several of God's miracles. My problem is with certain guests he has. Today or yesterday his guest was Kenneth Copeland. I keep on seeing that demonic Holy Laughter activity that I showed on another thread. Why would Pat give KC a wider audience and some legitimacy to the Holy Laughter Movement, if it truly is a movement. Pat also has a certain amount of respect of the Roman Catholic Pope. I don't see this when Pat's son runs the show but it usually follows the same formula. The guest is usually plugging a book, or books.
At what point in time do we dismiss certain Christian teachers, supposedly of the word, who have reached the point of irrelevance? Take Billy Graham for another example? Thoughts anyone?
At what point in time do we dismiss certain Christian teachers, supposedly of the word, who have reached the point of irrelevance? Take Billy Graham for another example? Thoughts anyone?