Pakistani Immigrant Gangs rape vulnerable White girls all over England

Nazaroo

New member
Even with the police backpedalling and denying its an "ethnic issue",
they confess that the statistics are skyrocketing as Pakistani immigrants target
and repeatedly victimize vulnerable and unprotected British youth.

The new euphemism for Pakistani immigrant Rapists is "Asians",
a plain diversion aimed at hiding the true identity of these monstrous criminal gangs.

The authorities admit that the real RACISM is in the view held by Pakistanis,
that white girls are inferior, worthless, 'free game', and have no status
compared to Pakistani girls, who are 'off limits' for rape because they are intended for marriage material.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bD0YEtuacUk

 

This Charming Manc

Well-known member
Wrong again, most of these guys are not immigrants, but 2nd or 3rd generation Muslims.

Its a significant issue that been in the public eye here for 2 or 3 years.

However the Muslim population of the UK is about 2,700,000 after rigorous police investigation and prosecutions nationwide we have less than 100 convictions, never acceptable but a very small percentage of the Muslim community.

So lets be clear these child abusers are Muslim and mainly of Pakistani descent, but most British people of Pakistani descent are not child abusers.
 

patrick jane

BANNED
Banned
Wrong again, most of these guys are not immigrants, but 2nd or 3rd generation Muslims.

Its a significant issue that been in the public eye here for 2 or 3 years.

However the Muslim population of the UK is about 2,700,000 after rigorous police investigation and prosecutions nationwide we have less than 100 convictions, never acceptable but a very small percentage of the Muslim community.

So lets be clear these child abusers are Muslim and mainly of Pakistani descent, but most British people of Pakistani descent are not child abusers.

Conviction rates are a drop in the bucket compared to actual crime
 

brewmama

New member
Wrong again, most of these guys are not immigrants, but 2nd or 3rd generation Muslims.

Its a significant issue that been in the public eye here for 2 or 3 years.

However the Muslim population of the UK is about 2,700,000 after rigorous police investigation and prosecutions nationwide we have less than 100 convictions, never acceptable but a very small percentage of the Muslim community.

So lets be clear these child abusers are Muslim and mainly of Pakistani descent, but most British people of Pakistani descent are not child abusers.

"Rigorous police investigation"? That's a joke. The much more typical reaction is strict political correctness and looking the other way.

So those "100 convicted" did thousands upon thousands of sexual abuse incidents? That doesn't ring false to you?

And maybe they aren't fresh immigrants, but it certainly shows a major problem with assimilation, as anyone with a brain would see. And it's fine with me, and much more truthful, to say they are Muslims rather than immigrants. And how about the massive increase in rapes that ARE being perpetrated by the immigrants in Scandinavia and Germany? You really think the ones in Britain are different?


"In 2002, a Labour MP from nearby Keighley, Ann Cryer, complained to the police about “young Asian lads” raping girls in her constituency. In her words, she “was shunned by elements of her party.” And note that, as is demanded by the Left in the UK, she didn’t even mention that the rapists were Pakistani, lest Muslims be blamed for this evil. They were “Asian lads.” And, for the record, her attempts to get local imams to intervene with the men failed; she was called a racist. National Review editor Rich Lowry reports that “in a BBC documentary, the author of a 2002 report to the Rotherham council on the scandal said her work was quashed. When she noted that the perpetrators were from the Pakistani community, a colleague told her ‘you must never refer to that again — you must never refer to Asian men.’ She was sent to diversity training and, by her account, nearly fired.” British home secretary Theresa May told Parliament that “institutionalized political correctness” was responsible for the lack of attention given to the mass rape. In 2011, Jack Straw, an MP and former UK home secretary, announced that “there is a specific problem which involves Pakistani heritage men . . . who target vulnerable young white girls.” Straw was dismissed by the Left. For example, Keith Vaz, a Labour MP, told the BBC: “I disagree with Jack Straw . . . I don’t think you can stereotype an entire community.”

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/387428/1400-english-girls-raped-multiculturalism-dennis-prager
 

This Charming Manc

Well-known member
True but it has been a matter of priority for our police for the last 2 -3 years, so I would assume conviction rates are reasonably high

If we assume 1 in 10 conviction rate we see 1 in 270,000 of British Muslims 270,000 involved.

If we assume 1 in 100 conviction rate we see 1 in 270,000 of British Muslims 27,000 involved.

Both a far cry from the implied narrative.

Conviction rates are a drop in the bucket compared to actual crime
 

This Charming Manc

Well-known member
"Rigorous police investigation"? That's a joke. The much more typical reaction is strict political correctness and looking the other way.

Not a joke, I live in the country, I have followed the news reports, I have seen the story develop. The story is available for you right wing
'journalists' to comment on because of

Recent police investigations and prosecutions.
The cofey independent inquiry.

The reports did show systemic issues in which abuse was not dealt with for years due to multicultural issues. However in the last 4 years that been turned on its head and the police have been thorough in there investigations.

So those "100 convicted" did thousands upon thousands of sexual abuse incidents? That doesn't ring false to you?

Its the cases that got to court, there obviously are more but not enough to suggest the whole community was involved.

And maybe they aren't fresh immigrants, but it certainly shows a major problem with assimilation, as anyone with a brain would see.

Seems like more of cultural issue within the Pakistani community, rather than Muslims per say. There is an assimilation issue with some men of Pakistani descent, engage with western liberal sexual values.

And it's fine with me, and much more truthful, to say they are Muslims rather than immigrants. And how about the massive increase in rapes that ARE being perpetrated by the immigrants in Scandinavia and Germany? You really think the ones in Britain are different?

Ok I looked into this, here are the rape statistics per country, do some comparisons.

http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Rape-rate#-amount

Ok the data is a little, old, but none of the articles supporting your claims had viable stats.
 

brewmama

New member
Not a joke, I live in the country, I have followed the news reports, I have seen the story develop. The story is available for you right wing
'journalists' to comment on because of

Recent police investigations and prosecutions.
The cofey independent inquiry.

The reports did show systemic issues in which abuse was not dealt with for years due to multicultural issues. However in the last 4 years that been turned on its head and the police have been thorough in there investigations.



Its the cases that got to court, there obviously are more but not enough to suggest the whole community was involved.



Seems like more of cultural issue within the Pakistani community, rather than Muslims per say. There is an assimilation issue with some men of Pakistani descent, engage with western liberal sexual values.



Ok I looked into this, here are the rape statistics per country, do some comparisons.

http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Rape-rate#-amount

Ok the data is a little, old, but none of the articles supporting your claims had viable stats.

Yes, it's a little old, since I'm talking about the current massive influx of refugees...


"A growing number of women and young girls housed in refugee shelters in Germany are being raped, sexually assaulted and even forced into prostitution by male asylum seekers, according to German social work organizations with first-hand knowledge of the situation.

Many of the rapes are occurring in mixed-gender shelters, where, due to a lack of space, German authorities are forcing thousands of male and female migrants to share the same sleeping areas and restroom facilities.

Conditions for women and girls at some shelters are so perilous that females are being described as "wild game" fighting off Muslim male predators. But many victims, fearing reprisals, are keeping silent, social workers say.

At the same time, growing numbers of German women in towns and cities across the country are being raped by asylum seekers from Africa, Asia and the Middle East. Many of the crimes are being downplayed by German authorities and the national media, apparently to avoid fueling anti-immigration sentiments..."
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/6527/migrants-rape-germany

"Yesterday, the Mail reported how social workers and women’s groups in Giessen wrote a letter to the local state parliament claiming that rape and child abuse were rife in the refugee camp. The allegations were corroborated by Atif over his curry. ‘The camp is dangerous,’ he agreed. ‘Men of different nationalities fight and women are attacked.’
Many women have felt the need to sleep in their clothes... they won’t go to the toilet at night because rapes and assaults have taken place on their way to, or from, there.
Letter written by social workers and women's groups in the Giessen camp
The letter says the camp, far from being a peaceful haven for those fleeing war, is a dangerous melting-pot, where there have been ‘numerous rapes and sexual assaults, and forced prostitution’.
There are even reports of children being raped and subjected to sexual assault, it adds.
‘Many women have felt the need to sleep in their clothes... they won’t go to the toilet at night because rapes and assaults have taken place on their way to, or from, there. Even in daylight, a walk through the camp is fraught with fear.’ "


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...told-cover-mood-s-changing.html#ixzz3vxzJzR00


Some 30 Muslim men thought that the woman was in violation of Islamic sharia law, by being in Sweden unaccompanied by a man. They thought that she should therefore be raped and her teenage son killed.

Two Swedish citizens were convicted by a Gothenburg Court of joining an Islamist terror group in Syria and murdering two captives. Video evidence showed one victim being beheaded. "Every night when I have gone to bed, I have seen a head hanging in the air." — Court Chairman Ralf G. Larsson.

Sometime during the night, the victim was awakened by the Iraqi as he raped her. The woman managed to break free and locate a train attendant. At first, the woman did not want to call the police. "She felt sorry for him [the rapist] ... and was afraid he would be deported back to Iraq."

One week after Sweden raised its terror alert level to the highest ever, the police raised another alarm -- saying their weapons are simply not good enough to prevent a potential terror attack.
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/7133/sweden-rapes-acquittals-severed-heads

The total Muslim population in Sweden is estimated at 4.4% (2013 figures). Out of that 4.4% and in deducting the women and children, we can roughly guesstimate that around 2% are male. The foreign rape figures at 77.6% Muslim has been anonymously confirmed by Swedish polish in a phone conversation. The actual figure could be higher. These percentages do not include Muslims with Swedish citizenship contained within rapes in the figures categorized under “Swedish nationals”.

https://muslimstatistics.wordpress....slim-males-making-up-2-percent-of-population/
 

chair

Well-known member
...
So lets be clear these child abusers are Muslim and mainly of Pakistani descent, but most British people of Pakistani descent are not child abusers.

This is the most crucial point. It is very easy to drift from legitimate concern to bigotry and racism.
 

Nazaroo

New member
This is the most crucial point. It is very easy to drift from legitimate concern to bigotry and racism.


Lets be equally clear that Atheist-Communist "Jews" were behind the political push
to open the floodgates of uncontrolled immigration into Europe,
and its seems to be mainly a 'revenge'-motivated covert attack,
meant to cause confusion and division in Europe and weaken European power
and interest in the Middle Eastern events controlled by Banksters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rA7Ymki71fM







Jews Demand Open Borders for USA, But Use DNA to Keep Israel Racially Pure

December 20, 2013 by TNO Staff— in Middle East, Science, Americas, North America · 17 Comments

Jews in America are 100 percent united in demanding “open borders” and “immigration reform”—but at the same time hypocritically support Israel which now uses DNA tests on potential immigrants in order to keep the Jewish state racially pure.
Just this past weekend, nearly 1,300 rabbis and a number of cantors from all streams of American Jewry joined together to call on the US Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform.
In a letter sent to the Congress, which they also published on their website, the rabbis said that immigration reform was “in keeping” with the “Jewish High Holy Days” demand of “the spirit of self-examination as individuals and as a society.”
The letter was signed by leading clergy of the Reform, Conservative, Orthodox, and Reconstructionist movements and called for “common sense immigration reform” to reflect a “shared commitment to a path to citizenship, improved family reunification policies, humane and effective border security, sensible worker visa policies, and avenues for refugees and asylum seekers.”
The letter went on to say that Jewish history “coupled with the most-often repeated Biblical commandment to love the stranger inspires our advocacy for immigration reform…”
moshe.jpg
Sammie Moshenberg, operations director of the Washington NJWC gives Communist salute during sit-in pro-immigration protest in D.C. this past week. This is not the only such statement by the organized Jewish community in America. Just this past week, the director of Washington operations for the National Council of Jewish Women, Sammie Moshenberg , was among more than 100 activists arrested for a “sit-in” pro-immigration protest at the US Capitol building.
The American Jewish Congress (AJC), the single largest Jewish organization in America, has a special advocacy group set up to promote “immigration reform.”
According to the AJC website devoted specially to promoting nonwhite immigration into America, that Jewish organization boasts that it “promotes a fair and just immigration policy consistent with our position that a strong America is vital for global freedom and security.
AJC1.jpg

“National conflict over immigration undermines America’s strength and our country’s commitment to democratic and humanitarian values. With our shared immigrant experience, the Jewish people understand that upholding the rights of immigrants is vital to a strong America,” the AJC says.
An article in the Jewish newspaper, the Daily Forward, announced that “Jews Unite Behind Push for Immigration Reform” and significantly added that “Ethics and Self-Interest Drive Unusual Nationwide Effort.”
forward012.jpg

The Daily Forward article says that those “leading an active push for the [immigration reform] bill, which will offer a path to citizenship for some of the nation’s 11 million undocumented aliens, include the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League, the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, Bend the Arc and the National Council of Jewish Women.
“The Senate vote—and the even harder struggle that will follow in the Republican-controlled House—represents the fulfillment of a sustained campaign by the Jewish community for immigration reform, which has built momentum over the past decade.
Quoting the president and CEO of an organization called the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS)—which used to promote Jewish immigration, but now promotes all nonwhite immigration into America, Mark Hetfield, the Daily Forward said Jews promoted immigration because it was in their ‘strategic interest.’
“It’s the ethical thing to do,” said HIAS president and CEO, of the community’s immigration reform activism. But he quickly added, “It’s in our strategic interest.”
However, in Israel—which all of these Jewish organizations and individuals quoted above support fanatically—an immigration policy which is the exact opposite is rigorously enforced.
Israel’s “Law of Return” immigration policy is actually based upon the Nazi Nuremburg race laws, which defined a Jew as anyone with two or more Jewish grandparents.
This law of return is not based on religion—because Jewish atheists also qualify for settlement in Israel. They do not have to be believing Jews to come to Israel—all they have to have is biological Jewish ancestry.
In addition, it is illegal for Jews to marry non-Jews in Israel—another direct carryover from the Nazi laws concerning race.
jewish-marriage1.jpg

Israel also has a zero tolerance policy for asylum seekers. They have set up concentration camps in which thousands of Africans are interred awaiting deportation, and most recently, the Jewish state announced that it was deporting all Africans to Uganda, no matter which country they originally came from.
Israeli concentration in southern Israel set up to hold African asylum seekers.
israel-deports-Africans1.jpg

Finally, Israel has recently announced that it is to start testing immigrants for Jewish DNA before allowing them to settle in Israel. This significant move (because it confirms a biological basis to Judaism) came about because of concern in Israel over suspected non-Jews entering Israel from the former Soviet Union countries.
TOI-DNA2.jpg

Israel, therefore, has a completely racially-based immigration policy, and only allows people of biological Jewish descent to immigrate to that nation.
This policy is directly contradictory to the position taken by Jewish groups in America and other European nations—yet these same Jewish organizations will defend Israel to the last.
To put this into perspective: If America, or any nation for that matter, had to adopt racially based immigration policies and check the DNA of potential immigrants before allowing them to settle, these Jewish organizations would be up in arms and screaming “Nazi” and “holocaust” from the rooftops.
Yet Israel can adopt such policies without anyone raising so much as a peep of protest. On the contrary, these same Jewish organizations will fanatically support Israel’s “right to be a Jewish state.”
Why do Jews promote nonwhite immigration into European nations while simultaneously supporting Israel’s racially based immigration policies? This is a topic which cuts to the core of the question, and is addressed in the last section of this book.
*This article has been extracted from the forthcoming book The Fall of Jerusalem: Rome, Jews, and the Origins of Jewish Racism by Arthur Kemp.

 

chair

Well-known member
Lets be equally clear that Atheist-Communist "Jews" were behind the political push
to open the floodgates of uncontrolled immigration into Europe,
and its seems to be mainly a 'revenge'-motivated covert attack,
meant to cause confusion and division in Europe and weaken European power
and interest in the Middle Eastern events controlled by Banksters.
...

You show that some liberal Jews in the US want more open immigration policy. While in Israel there is a move against illegal immigrants.

Guess what? There are many opinions among us, and we live in different countries. You are taking these generalizations too far- but that is just part of your usual bigotry.

And your identification of Jews with communists and atheists is ridiculous.

You are not an anti-semite. You are simply a bigoted gentleman with an inflated ego, and an inability to sort out reality from conspiracy theories.

Then you wonder why I am not so pleased to accept your occasional
"support" for Israel. Your "support" is embarrassing.
 

zoo22

Well-known member
Nazaroo just posted a video called "Jews admit to destroying white race." And you people are engaging in some sort of rational(ish) conversation with him? I don't get it. Why do you do it? What sort of outcome are you expecting?
 

Selaphiel

Well-known member
Nazaroo just posted a video called "Jews admit to destroying white race." And you people are engaging in some sort of rational(ish) conversation with him? I don't get it. Why do you do it? What sort of outcome are you expecting?

Good reason to set expectations to low when you are dealing with a poster who thinks "Lisa Haven News Christian, End Time, and Conspiracy News!" is an actual credible news source to argue for the New World Order.
 

bybee

New member
Nazaroo just posted a video called "Jews admit to destroying white race." And you people are engaging in some sort of rational(ish) conversation with him? I don't get it. Why do you do it? What sort of outcome are you expecting?

I believe he is demented. Tol has become a magnet for these "Scapegoater's"!
 

Nazaroo

New member
You show that some liberal Jews in the US want more open immigration policy. While in Israel there is a move against illegal immigrants.

Guess what? There are many opinions among us, and we live in different countries. You are taking these generalizations too far- but that is just part of your usual bigotry.

The point isn't that there are many different opinions among Jews, which should be a given.
"the Jews" is not a monolithic entity or private club or conspiracy,
as real anti-Semites and bigots would suggest.

The point is that the very same individual Jew can hold that
non-Jewish Europeans are racists for wanting reasonable limits and controls to immigration,
and opposing racial intermarriage and the destruction of their cultural heritage,
and actively push for massive immigration into Europe,
and manipulate political systems and the media to accomplish this,
while at the same time,
insisting upon strict controls to immigration to Israel and citizenship restrictions,
and also maintaining a national law that prohibits intermarriage between Jews
and non-Jews.

Moreover, that contradictory set of commitments is in fact commonplace
among Jews, especially in Israel, for obvious historical and political reasons.

Its called hypocrisy, and Jesus utterly condemned such hypocrisy as evil.

Its not that Jews differ in their opinions,
but that many Jews agree in their hypocrisy.

And your identification of Jews with communists and atheists is ridiculous.

Its well known that the 'communist' movement was dominated by Jewish leaders,
people who were actually not Jews by religion, but rather by ethnic self-identity.
I'll leave this minor point for others to google.
It really doesn't make that much difference in my view,
except to confirm that apostate Jews are as capable of mischief as any other ethnic group.


You are not an anti-semite. You are simply a bigoted gentleman with an inflated ego, and an inability to sort out reality from conspiracy theories.

I'm glad you realise that it is counter-productive to accuse a Jew who supports Israel of being an anti-Semite.

Your other charges are either mere ad hominem or a wish-list.




Then you wonder why I am not so pleased to accept your occasional
"support" for Israel. Your "support" is embarrassing
.

I am not surprised at all that my support for Israel is embarrassing to you,
since we differ on such important points as the identity of the Messiah.

But I'd be more embarrassed about trolling Christian forums
for the purpose of ridiculing Christianity if I were you.
 

Nazaroo

New member
It creates a problem, silence allows them a platform, engagement encourages more there rubbish.

Cant we just ban them permanently?

Sure. Just ban free speech, unless that speech agrees with your personal opinion.

Call me when they appoint you dictator and I will congratulate you on your big score.
 

Nazaroo

New member
Good reason to set expectations to low when you are dealing with a poster who thinks "Lisa Haven News Christian, End Time, and Conspiracy News!" is an actual credible news source to argue for the New World Order.

An old fallacy in debate is known as 'damning the source'.

The point is however, was that source correct or not?

It doesn't matter really if the source was original, or merely another channel for information.

Do you believe that there is a conscious push by powerful elite toward a centralized
world government or not?

If you don't believe that many powerful elite do want that,
you are politically naive and are refusing to listen to the very people
who insist on clearly articulating their own wishes, intents and purpose.

So I ask you simply,
Do you believe that certain powerful lobbyists are seeking an international government
and law, or not?

If not, what do you think the purpose of the League of Nations, the United Nations,
and the constant discussion of a 'New World Order' is really all about?

Its not a conspiracy if people are openly lobbying for some political cause.

And I'm not a conspiracy theorist if I listen to them and assume they are being frank.
 
Top