I saw the video.
It did not appear that Trump was mocking someone's physical handicap, as claimed by the media.
It appeared that Trump was mocking the stupidity shown by the statement that the reporter made about not being able to remember anything about Muslims in America cheering on 9/11.
Why was it acceptable to make fun of Bush's slight but unfortunate facial resemblance to a chimp? Where's the line between what's fair game and what isn't, and who decides?
I said I saw the video.Oh, because I saw him gimp his hand and make a claw and start shaking, with his arm bent at the elbow, then making faces and changing his voice. It's well documented that's what he did, no matter what you saw.
Agreed ... anyone who mocks the disabilities of others is a horrible human being.
Why was it acceptable to make fun of Bush's slight but unfortunate facial resemblance to a chimp? Where's the line between what's fair game and what isn't, and who decides?
In the UK the term handicapped is frowned upon. The PC term is challenged.
It appears the Pulitzer prize winning reporter is trying to use his disability for an additional 15 minutes of fame by falsely accusing Trump of mocking him.Trump denies ever having met the disabled reporter he is accused of cruelly mimicking and says the 'poor guy' should stop using his disability to 'GRANDSTAND'
I have no idea who this reporter, Serge Kovalski is, what he looks like or his level of intelligence. I don’t know if he is J.J. Watt or Muhammad Ali in his prime --- or somebody of less athletic or physical ability. I know nothing about him other than I have great respect for the way he wrote the story, on September 18, 2001, and in particular the paragraph talking about Muslims and tailgate parties taking place in New Jersey.