Nazaroo
New member
Detained without trial and put in a psych ward and isolated from public
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGV90wQaX3M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGV90wQaX3M
Obama going after War Veterans who own guns
- Thread starter Nazaroo
- Start date
Nazaroo
New member
Nazaroo
New member
Nazaroo
New member
Nazaroo
New member
zoo22
Well-known member
The freedom-lover in Nazaroo's videos was questioned by the FBI and put in a psych ward for evaluation for a week, because of his violent posts on Facebook threatening the government. His friends turned him in to the FBI because they thought he had become dangerous. The story is three years old.
In case you missed that: Mr. McFreedom was posting violent anti-government threats on his Facebook page. His own friends turned him in to the FBI because they thought he was dangerous. He was arrested and questioned by the FBI and then put into a Veteran's hospital psych ward for evaluation, for a week.
Detained for a week, three years ago, because he was publicly making violent threats against the government. He's been free since then.
Oh, no wait, I'm wrong... ! He hasn't been free since then, because last year he was arrested for giving underage girls alcohol and sexually exposing himself to them. One of those girls was 13.
In case you missed that: Nazaroo's guy was arrested for getting underage girls drunk and exposing himself to them. The girls were 13 and 17. He was 28.
It's ironic that Nazaroo chooses to ignore this.
But no way, that was probably a government psy-op false flag. What better way for Obama to discredit a freedom-loving freedom fighter that to have him arrested for sexually molesting minors?
Nazaroo, are you on a mission to turn TOL into a wasteland, void of any real discussion? It's working. You, aCW, serpentdove and republicanchick seem to have taken over the helm and have sailed the place straight into the ground.
In case you missed that: Mr. McFreedom was posting violent anti-government threats on his Facebook page. His own friends turned him in to the FBI because they thought he was dangerous. He was arrested and questioned by the FBI and then put into a Veteran's hospital psych ward for evaluation, for a week.
Detained for a week, three years ago, because he was publicly making violent threats against the government. He's been free since then.
Oh, no wait, I'm wrong... ! He hasn't been free since then, because last year he was arrested for giving underage girls alcohol and sexually exposing himself to them. One of those girls was 13.
In case you missed that: Nazaroo's guy was arrested for getting underage girls drunk and exposing himself to them. The girls were 13 and 17. He was 28.
It's ironic that Nazaroo chooses to ignore this.
But no way, that was probably a government psy-op false flag. What better way for Obama to discredit a freedom-loving freedom fighter that to have him arrested for sexually molesting minors?
Nazaroo, are you on a mission to turn TOL into a wasteland, void of any real discussion? It's working. You, aCW, serpentdove and republicanchick seem to have taken over the helm and have sailed the place straight into the ground.
Sex-related charge dismissed against Facebook posting Marine
He was accused of indecent liberties with a 17-year-old
Nazaroo
New member
Obviously released because there was no credible evidence against him:
Its called Presumption of Innocence.
Charged, not convicted.
See Above:
Presumption of Innocence.
Something liberal Orwellians don't believe in.
Agreed.
Since it was unsuccessful and not credible, it must have been a govt. op...
Soldiers are subject to a different standard- this has always been the case, been around forever. They can get in trouble for speaking against the government or military.
Nazaroo
New member
Soldiers and ex-soldiers have the rights of any citizen.
if they give up any rights voluntarily its while in service.
He was out of service.
This story is 2 1/2 years old, would you like to comment on it? ("I hope" that you do).
Obama threatening veterans' gun rights
Feds send letters to warn those deemed 'incompetent' on firearms
2/22/13
In an apparent threat to Second Amendment rights, some American military veterans have received a letter from the Veterans Administration warning that their competency to handle their own affairs is under review, and if determined by government bureaucrats to be “incompetent,” they would be barred from possessing weapons.
The issue is being raised by the United States Justice Foundation, which defends civil and religious rights.
In a statement on the organization’s website, Executive Director Michael Connelly said his organization is pursuing a Freedom of Information Act demand to the Department of Veterans Affairs to “force them to disclose the criteria they are using to place veterans on the background check list that keeps them from exercising their Second Amendment rights.”
“Then we will take whatever legal steps are necessary to protect our American warriors,” he wrote.
He said he’s been approached by a significant number of veterans who have received letters from the VA.
An image of a letter dated Dec. 20, 2012, has been posted online at Red Flag News.
The letter states that the Department of Veterans Affairs has “received” information about the veteran that “because of your disabilities you may need help in handling your Department of Affairs (VA) benefits.”
However, it provides no details other that the information was “a report from Portland VA Medical Center.”
“The evidence indicates that you are not able to handle your VA benefit payments because of a physical or mental condition,” the letter warns. “We propose to rate you incompetent for VA purposes. This means we must decide if you are able to handle your VA benefit payments. We will base our decision on all the evidence we already have including any other evidence you sent to us.”
Completion of the incompetency determination means that a “fiduciary” would be appointed to manage the veteran’s payments.
The VA also warns: “A determination of incompetency will prohibit you from purchasing, possessing, receiving, or transporting a firearm or ammunition. If you knowingly violate any of these prohibitions, you may be fined, imprisoned, or both.”
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/obama-threatening-veterans-gun-rights/#rbCgoWkBD4Yh1Cm3.99
We all know if 2nd Amendment rights depended on one's mental condition, not one liberal would be able to own a firearm (most of them don't, they hire someone with a gun to protect them).
Nazaroo
New member
Can you even proof-read a sentence?
Its kind of an ironic anti-climax when you sound crazy.
So is your English.