ECT Non-worship interest

Interplanner

Well-known member
The 2P2P biblicists/fantasists/addicts are on the war path again against history. History is "worship" to them. It is a sin to worship someone other than Christ.

Even if you just want to know how Haeckl started something in science that Hitler used with political adroitness a generation later, it is a 'sin' to know about either (now that I think about it, that's 'perfect' for those guys--they would have blasted anyone investigating them as a sin, and thrown them in prison).

But hey if one goat dies in Leviticus and the other of that pair is sent off in the wildernness, then why on earth would it matter if the zealot movement started during Caesar's census in Lk 2 and was mentioned in Acts 5? I mean, really, is that goat worship? If it is not goat worship, then is the other zealot worship? Even if it is mentioned in Acts 5?
 

Interplanner

Well-known member
It matters when John said, Behold the Lamb of God that taketh away the sins of the world.

The real Bible student will think back to Leviticus.

So, which goat "taketh away" the sins?




And John or the writer didn't make your hugely important distinction because:
 

Danoh

New member
So, which goat "taketh away" the sins?

Not to mention that IP very well knows his endless books "about" do NOT depict John the Baptist as having believed that Christ had come to die for sin.

So much for all his endless blathering on about his supposed "authority" on the various groups of that century :chuckle:
 
Top