Daniel50 said:
Dearly beloved in Christ, I honestly tell you Animals have no souls.
.
Strong seems to disagree.
H5315 נֶפֶשׁ
nephesh neh'-fesh
From H5314; properly a breathing creature, that is, animal or (abstractly) vitality; used very widely in a literal, accommodated or figurative sense (bodily or mental):—any, appetite, beast, body, breath, creature, X dead (-ly), desire, X [dis-] contented, X fish, ghost, + greedy, he, heart (-y), (hath, X jeopardy of) life (X in jeopardy), lust, man, me, mind, mortality, one, own, person, pleasure, (her-, him-, my-, thy-) self, them (your) -selves, + slay, soul, + tablet, they, thing, (X she) will, X would have it.
G5590 ψυχή
psuchē psoo-khay'
From G5594; breath, that is, (by implication) spirit, abstractly or concretely (the animal sentient principle only; thus distinguished on the one hand from G4151, which is the rational and immortal soul; and on the other from G2222, which is mere vitality, even of plants: these terms thus exactly correspond respectively to the Hebrew [H5315], [H7307] and [H2416]:—heart (+ -ily), life, mind, soul, + us, + you.
As should be obvious from above, the confusion about the English word "soul" comes about because it is overused in translations to apply to different concepts in both the old and new testaments, making it necessary to refer to the original Hebrew and Greek to properly determine the exact meaning in a particular verse.
The thread title was an example of my twisted humor being used to get a discussion going on an interesting and important subject.
BTW, I doubt if there is a reason why God
couldn't resurrect our pets to be with us in heaven if He wanted to, but I am content to leave that totally up to Him with no input at all from me.
After all, He knows best. :first: