More problems with voting machines uncovered, this time in New Hampshire

marke

Well-known member
After asking for a recount due to her narrow loss in the election, a democrat was found to have been given too many votes and republicans to have been given too few votes. That seems to be a consistent trend among voting machines widely used in the US for the last few years.

Election auditors Windham, New Hampshire, are saying that some of their latest findings are “large enough to account for discrepancies” in the Nov. 3 election results for four state representative seats.
Auditors said they found “experimental confirmation that if the contest is undervoted, a fold through a vote target can create a vote.” ...
Harri Hursti, another auditor, wrote on Twitter that testing proved folded ballots were misinterpreted by machines. ...
Auditors finished the hand recount on May 21. The audit began on May 11.
AccuVote didn’t respond to a request for comment about the audit authorization. The AccuVote machines’ intellectual property is owned by Dominion Voting Systems. ...
Democrat candidate Kristi St. Laurent, who lost by a narrow margin of 24 votes, requested an audit (pdf) claiming that the machines were improperly programmed, and that double voting was involved. ...
An automatic recount was done, resulting in St. Laurent losing 99 more votes after a hand recount. Meanwhile, four Republicans gained about 300 votes each. ...
The audit team said thThe audit team said that more issues could be involved besides folded ballots being misinterpreted.
“The fold effect is large enough to account for discrepancies, but might not be all that’s going on,” the team said on Twitter on May 22, adding that “75 folded ballots voted straight Republican. Only 48 votes recorded for them. Folds generated overvotes. This is machine used on Election Day [for] most absentee ballots.”
Another machine was found to have “an even more dramatic problem” by the auditors, who said that only 28 percent of the votes for Republican candidates were counted.
“The work is not completed yet. While the folding seems to be a strong contributor it clearly is not the only factor,” Hursti said on Sunday. “For example: We have observed vastly different error rates on two machines processing the same ballots. Work continues.”
 

Gary K

New member
Banned
Yeah, "the most secure" election ever. No problems whatsoever.

We've been held in ignorance for decades as to just how corrupt things in the country really are.
 

marke

Well-known member
Or you just haven't been paying attention...
Exactly. Democrat voter fraud goes back more than 100 years in America.

Between 1865 and 1900, there were 262 disputed House elections. Most occurred in the states of the former Confederacy. The 1880 election that produced the 47th Congress of 1881-83 gave rise to 19 cases of alleged election fraud. One egregious example was the race for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives in South Carolina. In that state’s First Congressional District, a one-two punch of violence and fraud wrenched political power away from a black majority that had voted strongly Republican during Reconstruction.
 
Top