Here's your problem!
Far right "extremist" is a non sequitur. The opposite of right is both "left" and "wrong." So to be "extremely" on the right doesn't make things worse. One can never be too right. One can never err by moving to the right.
Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk
Nope.
Case in point: The Pharisees would be considered Far Right Fundamentalist:
Acts 23:6 But when Paul perceived that the one part were Sadducees, and the other Pharisees, he cried out in the council, Men and brethren, I am a Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee: of the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question. Acts 23:7 And when he had so said, there arose a dissension between the Pharisees and the Sadducees: and the multitude was divided. Acts 23:8 For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit: but the Pharisees confess both.
But various of them were Extremist Bigots within said Far Right (the Nation Israel was meant to have been, as a whole, Rom. 2:17-20).
Just like Extremist Bigots within the Far Right are now.
Thus, what the Lord said to their kind and their ever justifying their looking down their hypocritical noses at anyone who does not agree with their extremism and bigotry.
Luke 11:42 But woe unto you, Pharisees! for ye tithe mint and rue and all manner of herbs, and pass over judgment and the love of God: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
Making the non-sequitur, no longer the case.
For there is a reason why Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are considered Social gospels.
Because within the narrative of those four Books, Christ is repeatedly depicted as having been a Liberal CONSERVATIVE.
(not to be confused with a Conservative LIBERAL):
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_conservatism
Thus, His Words to those Pharisees He found Extremists and Bigots.
Rom. 14:5; Rom. 5:6-8.