The truthsmacking Turbo lays out in the following post is so crisp and so clear that this could very possibly earn Post of the Year.
context
:first:Oh righto CRASH, it's not a travesty of justice for innocent people to be executed, that sure makes sense :squint:
Of course it is tragic when an innocent person is punished for a crime he did not commit, regardless of what that punishment is.
But why is it, red77, that you so passionately defend murderers, rapists, and other criminals whom God commanded should be put to death; yet when it comes to an innocent baby in the womb, you support that baby's execution if his or her father happens to be a rapist.
Rapists should not be executed, says red77, because we might inadvertently execute an innocent person at some point. But sons and daughters of rapists can be executed with red77's approval, even though every single one of them is innocent.
People should not be punished for their fathers' crimes, red77. (See Jer 18.) In this case, you endorse a punishment for innocent children that you deem too harsh for their guilty fathers!
Will you repent of your support for the intentional slaughter of innocent people?
context