John Solomon: Massive election integrity problems in Georgia

expos4ever

Well-known member
Here is something from this investigator:

Election processes in Georgia’s most populous county were badly managed, sloppy and chaotic, but there was no evidence of fraud, said an independent monitor who spent many hours over several months observing county election workers.

Detailed notes kept by Carter Jones over the week of the general election in November and obtained by The Associated Press challenge many of the allegations of fraud and misconduct that have circulated since the election. They chronicle everything Jones saw in Fulton County from the evening of Monday, Nov. 2, the day before the election, through late Saturday, Nov. 7, when the last ballots were counted.

“It’s not what it looks like during the election. It’s what happens after the election and what it looks like at the end,” Jones said in an exclusive interview with the AP on Wednesday. “Fulton was able to make their numbers zero out and there was nothing that should challenge the certification of this election.
 

marke

Well-known member
Here is something from this investigator:

Election processes in Georgia’s most populous county were badly managed, sloppy and chaotic, but there was no evidence of fraud, said an independent monitor who spent many hours over several months observing county election workers.

Detailed notes kept by Carter Jones over the week of the general election in November and obtained by The Associated Press challenge many of the allegations of fraud and misconduct that have circulated since the election. They chronicle everything Jones saw in Fulton County from the evening of Monday, Nov. 2, the day before the election, through late Saturday, Nov. 7, when the last ballots were counted.

“It’s not what it looks like during the election. It’s what happens after the election and what it looks like at the end,” Jones said in an exclusive interview with the AP on Wednesday. “Fulton was able to make their numbers zero out and there was nothing that should challenge the certification of this election.
There is no apparent evidence of fraud on the surface but nobody knows what might lie below the surface. To find out whether fraud took place or not a complete forensics examination of the machines and votes must be done. The problem is that if democrats did commit fraud using voting machines, their refusal to allow investigators access to those machines for so long has given them time to wipe the machines clean of incriminating evidence. If that happened we may never be able to prove whether voter fraud took place or did not take place.
 

marke

Well-known member
Fox Conservatives: no matter how outlandish the story, we will believe it just to own the libs. Q crumbs, Jewish space lasers, Italian military satellites changing votes, bamboo ballots, it's all good.
If Americans wanted the crooks to win they will not see the thousands of pieces of evidence of massive voter fraud if those pieces of evidence were taped to their eyeballs 23 hours a day.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
If Americans wanted the crooks to win they will not see the thousands of pieces of evidence of massive voter fraud if those pieces of evidence were taped to their eyeballs 23 hours a day.
First you'd have to produce that evidence--which is something you have yet to do.
 
Last edited:

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Top