SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
Those are the biblical facts.
The Protestant Magisterium has misled you.
Those are the biblical facts.
Luke 9:6 And they departed, and went through the towns, preaching the gospel, and healing every where.
so beautifully simple.Luke 9:1 Then he called his twelve disciples together, and gave them power and authority over all devils, and to cure diseases.
Luke 9:2 And he sent them to preach the kingdom of God, and to heal the sick.
Luke 9:3 And he said unto them, Take nothing for your journey, neither staves, nor scrip, neither bread, neither money; neither have two coats apiece.
Luke 9:4 And whatsoever house ye enter into, there abide, and thence depart.
Luke 9:5 And whosoever will not receive you, when ye go out of that city, shake off the very dust from your feet for a testimony against them.
Luke 9:6 And they departed, and went through the towns, preaching the gospel, and healing every where.
Luke 18:31 Then he took unto him the twelve, and said unto them, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written by the prophets concerning the Son of man shall be accomplished.
Luke 18:32 For he shall be delivered unto the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and spitefully entreated, and spitted on:
Luke 18:33 And they shall scourge him, and put him to death: and the third day he shall rise again.
Luke 18:34 And they understood none of these things: and this saying was hid from them, neither knew they the things which were spoken.
Accept this correction Nang, humble yourself.
:first:Luke 9:1 Then he called his twelve disciples together, and gave them power and authority over all devils, and to cure diseases.
Luke 9:2 And he sent them to preach the kingdom of God, and to heal the sick.
Luke 9:3 And he said unto them, Take nothing for your journey, neither staves, nor scrip, neither bread, neither money; neither have two coats apiece.
Luke 9:4 And whatsoever house ye enter into, there abide, and thence depart.
Luke 9:5 And whosoever will not receive you, when ye go out of that city, shake off the very dust from your feet for a testimony against them.
Luke 9:6 And they departed, and went through the towns, preaching the gospel, and healing every where.
Luke 18:31 Then he took unto him the twelve, and said unto them, Behold, we go up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written by the prophets concerning the Son of man shall be accomplished.
Luke 18:32 For he shall be delivered unto the Gentiles, and shall be mocked, and spitefully entreated, and spitted on:
Luke 18:33 And they shall scourge him, and put him to death: and the third day he shall rise again.
Luke 18:34 And they understood none of these things: and this saying was hid from them, neither knew they the things which were spoken.
Accept this correction Nang, humble yourself.
The disciples were not proclaiming the death and resurrection of Jesus during this commission.
Which you imply they were so doing in ignorance.
You don't have a clue what you are saying.
I KNOW they didn't preach the cross during those 3 years, but the HOLY BIBLE says they preached the gospel of the kingdom.
Humble yourself, and accept correction.
You don't have a clue what you are saying.
I KNOW they didn't preach the cross during those 3 years, but the HOLY BIBLE says they preached the gospel of the kingdom.
Humble yourself, and accept correction.
I believe there is only one gospel,
You don't have a clue what you are saying.
I KNOW they didn't preach the cross during those 3 years, but the HOLY BIBLE says they preached the gospel of the kingdom.
Humble yourself, and accept correction.
As do I! :cheers:Nang's beliefs based on the Protestant Magisterium vs. two clear passages from the Holy Bible
I know which I shall choose to stand with.
As do I! :cheers:
Only for the gospel of uncircumcision.
Only for the circumcision.
Then why don't you? The body is dead because of sin, but the Spirit is alive. Not for you, only those in Christ.
Romans 4
10 How then was it accounted? While he was circumcised, or uncircumcised? Not while circumcised, but while uncircumcised.
Once again, the gospel of circumcision is not the gospel of uncircumcision.
James is not wrong.
James 2
20 But do you want to know, O foolish man, that faith without works is dead? 21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered Isaac his son on the altar? 22 Do you see that faith was working together with his works, and by works faith was made perfect?
Paul mentions Abraham before circumcision. James mentions him afterwards. Why is this so hard for you all? I think you are not wrong, you are evil and being deceptive.
All irrelevant. We are talking about the Bible, not what people think of the Bible.
People who say that there has only ever been one gospel either:
1. Are insane
2. Don't believe the Holy Bible when shown the distinction
In other words no one can sincerely and with legitimate reasons believe anything else? I don't think that's correct. I would not say everyone who disagrees with me is crazy, stupid or hard-headed. That is quite an accusation considering that hardly anyone in Christendom believes MAD - or ever did, for that matter. We can disagree on a lot of matters and still be children of God (depending on what the truth issue is. On the other hand, we can agree on everything and not be.
What you have been talking about all this time is about what people, specifically a select number of people since the 1800s
In other words no one can sincerely and with legitimate reasons believe anything else? I don't think that's correct. I would not say everyone who disagrees with me is crazy, stupid or hard-headed. That is quite an accusation considering that hardly anyone in Christendom believes MAD - or ever did, for that matter. We can disagree on a lot of matters and still be children of God (depending on what the truth issue is. On the other hand, we can agree on everything and not be.
When a group does not have a sound biblical or intellectual basis/foundation to stand upon, they are reduced to ad hominem everytime they are confronted with fact.
These hyper-dispensationalists are badly brainwashed from the heretical authors they have picked to follow, and are so confused, they cannot form any decent argument without falling into arguments against each other . . . thus they offer no logical defenses at all in order to avoid embarrassing themselves.
Add to this, they cannot be convinced to read church history at all, in order to put their idols, Darby, Scofield, etc., into any perspective.
They have simply created an extremely shallow pond, in which they can pretend to be big fish, and there is absolutely no getting through to them at all.
Mad is the epitome of humanistic hermeneutics run full course resulting in mental and spiritual delusion.
Why? They possess no love of the truth. II Thessalonians 2:9-12
Mad is the epitome of humanistic hermeneutics run full course resulting in mental and spiritual delusion.