Is Romans through Philemon written specifically to the church, the Gospel of the Grace of God or is the Gospel of the Kingdom for us?
Is Romans through Philemon written specifically to the church, the Gospel of the Grace of God or is the Gospel of the Kingdom for us?
During Christ's earthly walk, He and His disciples preached the 'Kingdom Gospel.' (Matthew 10:5 "These twelve Jesus sent forth, and commanded them, saying, Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye not:" The Apostle Paul and his followers preached the 'Gospel of the grace of God.' (Ephesians 2:8) "For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:"
Yes, and even the saved who lived under the law were saved by grace through faith:
"Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all" (Ro.4:16).
Besides that, in his epistles Peter's no longer preached the "gospel of the kingdom" but instead the gospel which Paul referred to as "the preaching of the Cross":
"Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed...Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot" (1 Pet.2:24, 1:18-19).
Yes, and even the saved who lived under the law were saved by grace through faith:
"Therefore it is of faith, that it might be by grace; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed; not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham; who is the father of us all" (Ro.4:16).
Besides that, in his epistles Peter's no longer preached the "gospel of the kingdom" but instead the gospel which Paul referred to as "the preaching of the Cross":
"Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed...Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot" (1 Pet.2:24, 1:18-19).
Acts 20:24 "But none of these things move me, neither count I my life dear unto myself, so that I might finish my course with joy, and the ministry, which I have received of the Lord Jesus, to testify the gospel of the grace of God."
Where here does he preach the death , burial and resurrection of Jesus?
So there was nothing unique about Paul's stewardship?Yes, there Paul speaks of the stewardship to preach the gospel of grace. And Peter and those who received his epistle were given the same stewardship:"Each of you should use whatever gift you have received to serve others, as faithful stewards of God’s grace in its various forms" (1 Pet.4:10).
So there was nothing unique about Paul's stewardship?
:juggle:
You're crazy if you believe that.
The Apostle Paul was chosen to be the 'Apostle to the Gentiles' that cannot be denied. Paul had a different Gospel to preach other than, what the other Disciples (those who preached, along with the Lord Jesus Christ, the Kingdom Gospel to the House of Israel.) were preaching to the Jews. Paul preached, 'salvation through faith without works.' The Gentiles NEVER were under the Law nor did they receive it.
Galatians 2:7-8 "But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;
(For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles![]()
So there was nothing unique about Paul's stewardship?
You always claim yours is the only possible understanding. You're wrong about that too.Paul was the first to receive the gospel of grace and he was the first to preach it. However, not long after Paul was converted on the Damascus road he preached the following message to the Jews:
"And straightway he preached Christ in the synagogues, that he is the Son of God.....proving that this is the very Christ" (Acts 9:20,22).
At that time Paul had not yet received the gospel which he was to preach among the Gentiles. He wrote the following:"But when God, who set me apart from birth and called me by his grace, was pleased to reveal his Son in me so that I might preach him among the Gentiles, I did not consult any man, nor did I go up to Jerusalem to see those who were apostles before I was, but I went immediately into Arabia and later returned to Damascus" (Gal.1:15-17).
When Paul received a gospel from the Lord Jesus on the Damascus road he immediately went to Damascus (Acts 9:6-8). But when he received the gospel which he preached among the Gentiles he went immediately into Arabia. That can only mean that two different gospels were preached during the Acts period.
Please document the changing of the commissions of Paul and the twelve.Paul's commission underwent a change and so did the commission originally given to the Twelve. They were no longer preaching the gospel of the kingdom but instead the good news Paul described as "the preaching of the Cross":
"Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed...Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers; But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot" (1 Pet.2:24, 1:18-19).
You're crazy if you believe that is the gospel of the kingdom!