Ooh, impressive -- analyzing someone's psychology with a man paid to pretend to be other people. Very authoritative.
Now do one on all of Obama's 'uhhh's' and stammering when the teleprompter goes offline.
Oh...right...Obama is your god.
Actually, I've seen just as good spoofs of Obama.
But he is not the one in office, and I very seldom posted on here back then and you know this, poor memory, or not.
And apparantly you know nothing of how actors end up actors to begin with, nor about how they prepare for roles.
As to the latter - a character is brought to life through behavior.
The better the actor, the reason is because he is better than his peers at identifying what drives the personality of the role he is playing through it's behaviour.
It is both an art form and a technique very similar to that used by Behavioral Analysts within the many, varied Profiling units within the FBI.
Within the world of the better actors, acting is not pretending, it is being.
Ever worry about why someone is unreasonably late?
Ever notice said imaginings' impact on your emotions and behaviour?
Acting technique is merely a harnessing of that into...a conscious technique...that allows the actor to take on the personality of the role he is playing.
In this, Perlman was as dead center right on in his impersonation of your false idol, as an impression of Cary Grant or John Wayne by a Rich Little.
They take on where the person they are "being" looks at things from.
Recurrent behavioural patterns, o clueless one.
As for the rest of your post?
Just as narrow minded as the former part of it was.
Nevertheless, Rom. 5:8.
