lighthouse99
New member
Yeh, it's interesting how the liberals are always pointing accusatory fingers @ the Rs, saying they are always "attacking"
And this is a bad thing?! I don't think so. What is bad is when you decline to "attack" someone who has done egregious harm--harm to the Constitution, harm to the people, harm to security (Hillary Clinton).
No, what is really appalling is that Sanders is so nice to Hillary and wants us all to forget about that silly email situation that just made our country vulnerable to foreign enemy ATTACK, that's all
and etc, etc.
So i really respect the way the Republicans "attack" one another when they see that something wrong or potentially wrong has been done or said. True, if they only do it for political gain, that's not too good. But i would rather have these "attacks" than--people who seem to just be... well, the word is cronyism
:luigi:
And this is a bad thing?! I don't think so. What is bad is when you decline to "attack" someone who has done egregious harm--harm to the Constitution, harm to the people, harm to security (Hillary Clinton).
No, what is really appalling is that Sanders is so nice to Hillary and wants us all to forget about that silly email situation that just made our country vulnerable to foreign enemy ATTACK, that's all
and etc, etc.
So i really respect the way the Republicans "attack" one another when they see that something wrong or potentially wrong has been done or said. True, if they only do it for political gain, that's not too good. But i would rather have these "attacks" than--people who seem to just be... well, the word is cronyism
:luigi: