Hear from Barrett but first from Bob interviewed by the Post
This is the show from Tuesday, September 22nd, 2020
SUMMARY:
Today's program begins with this morning's secretly-recorded audio when a local reporter interviewed Bob Enyart about the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Then Bob presents a lengthier segment of Amy Coney Barrett's 2016 discussion of how judicial philosophy may affect the court's ruling. Notice how she volunteers mention of "abortion rights" and the matter-of-fact bureaucratic efficiency Barrett brings to the discussion of the slaughter of the innocent. The program concludes with a brief excerpt out of Vincent Bugliosi's Outrage: The Five Reasons Why O. J. Simpson Got Away with Murder: "David Kennedy, professor of history at Stanford University, in writing about politicians, says: “With the possible exception of lawyers, we hold no other professionals in such contempt. Who among us can utter the word ‘politician’ without a sneer?” Conventional logic would seem to dictate, then, that since a judge is normally both a politician and a lawyer, people would have an opinion of them lower than a grasshopper’s belly. But on the contrary, a $25 black cotton robe elevates the denigrated lawyer-politician to a position of considerable honor and respect in our society, as if the garment itself miraculously imbued the person with qualities not previously possessed. ... This [elevation] ignores reality." See also www.kgov.com/republican-judicial-crisis and www.kgov.com/crime.
This is the show from Tuesday, September 22nd, 2020
SUMMARY:
Today's program begins with this morning's secretly-recorded audio when a local reporter interviewed Bob Enyart about the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Then Bob presents a lengthier segment of Amy Coney Barrett's 2016 discussion of how judicial philosophy may affect the court's ruling. Notice how she volunteers mention of "abortion rights" and the matter-of-fact bureaucratic efficiency Barrett brings to the discussion of the slaughter of the innocent. The program concludes with a brief excerpt out of Vincent Bugliosi's Outrage: The Five Reasons Why O. J. Simpson Got Away with Murder: "David Kennedy, professor of history at Stanford University, in writing about politicians, says: “With the possible exception of lawyers, we hold no other professionals in such contempt. Who among us can utter the word ‘politician’ without a sneer?” Conventional logic would seem to dictate, then, that since a judge is normally both a politician and a lawyer, people would have an opinion of them lower than a grasshopper’s belly. But on the contrary, a $25 black cotton robe elevates the denigrated lawyer-politician to a position of considerable honor and respect in our society, as if the garment itself miraculously imbued the person with qualities not previously possessed. ... This [elevation] ignores reality." See also www.kgov.com/republican-judicial-crisis and www.kgov.com/crime.