Ghost Worms

[JudgeRightly]

https://scitechdaily.com/researcher...saurs-despite-140-million-years-of-evolution/

Alternate Explanation:

These worms are young, and not 140 million years old, but only a few thousand years old.

 

[Right Divider]

https://scitechdaily.com/researcher...saurs-despite-140-million-years-of-evolution/

Alternate Explanation:

These worms are young, and not 140 million years old, but only a few thousand years old.

Fairly often evolutionists bring up Occam's Razor to put down creationist ideas... this is a clear case of them failing to use it on their own theory.

 

[ok doser]

If you have a box of fishin' worms in your fridge older than a couple of weeks, don't open that box.

 

[Right Divider]

If you have a box of fishin' worms in your fridge older than a couple of weeks, don't open that box.

What is it's 140 million years old. :french:

 

[ok doser]

What is it's 140 million years old. :french:

seal the door of the fridge and put the whole thing in the dumpster

 

[Right Divider]

seal the door of the fridge and put the whole thing in the dumpster

:thumb:

 

[Jonahdog]

https://scitechdaily.com/researcher...saurs-despite-140-million-years-of-evolution/

Alternate Explanation:

These worms are young, and not 140 million years old, but only a few thousand years old.

How would you determine that?

 

[Right Divider]

How would you determine that?

The article claims that they are over 140 millions years old. How would you determine that?

It's hilarious to read articles from evolutionists when the evidence constantly conflicts with their "theory".