As many people believe mammoths went extinct during the same meteorite impact event that supposedly killed and buried all the dinosaurs they have to explain why dinosaur bones are fossilised in hard rock while the mammoths are found in deeply frozen deposits of 'muck'.
Muck is the technical term for the mass of soil, torn up creatures and vegetation that covers most of Siberia in which countless thousands of mammoths have been found by ivory collectors. The mammoth parts are tangled with parts of herbivore and carnivores showing that there must have been masses of creatures suddenly overwhelmed, torn up by great force and then buried under tsunamis of muck.
I say that the Bible chronology of the Flood being 4,350 years ago is correct and it was followed by the cloudiness that allowed Noah to see the new rainbows. That cloud cover and the fact the standing floodwaters had cooled Earth from its Genesis 2:9 state caused the post-Flood Ice age that built up great depths of ice and snow on the India-Tibet-China mountain area until some 200? years after the flood the weight overbalanced Earth to make it tilt fairly suddenly into the new alignment that scientiste claim gave Earth a new magnetic north.
During the 200 or so years from flood to tilt the creatures released from the ark had flourished on the great lush grasses that had sprouted from the sediments left by the floodwaters until there were massive herds to give the vast quantity of mammoth ivory.
The tilt would happen fairly quickly and as our equator is travelling at 1,000 mph any other point on a smaller latitude line would travel at very high speed sufficient to stir up hurricanes and tsunamis to rip great beasts to pieces and make waves to bury them in deep muck!
Does this sound likely despite what all the paleoarcheologists claim?
Muck is the technical term for the mass of soil, torn up creatures and vegetation that covers most of Siberia in which countless thousands of mammoths have been found by ivory collectors. The mammoth parts are tangled with parts of herbivore and carnivores showing that there must have been masses of creatures suddenly overwhelmed, torn up by great force and then buried under tsunamis of muck.
I say that the Bible chronology of the Flood being 4,350 years ago is correct and it was followed by the cloudiness that allowed Noah to see the new rainbows. That cloud cover and the fact the standing floodwaters had cooled Earth from its Genesis 2:9 state caused the post-Flood Ice age that built up great depths of ice and snow on the India-Tibet-China mountain area until some 200? years after the flood the weight overbalanced Earth to make it tilt fairly suddenly into the new alignment that scientiste claim gave Earth a new magnetic north.
During the 200 or so years from flood to tilt the creatures released from the ark had flourished on the great lush grasses that had sprouted from the sediments left by the floodwaters until there were massive herds to give the vast quantity of mammoth ivory.
The tilt would happen fairly quickly and as our equator is travelling at 1,000 mph any other point on a smaller latitude line would travel at very high speed sufficient to stir up hurricanes and tsunamis to rip great beasts to pieces and make waves to bury them in deep muck!
Does this sound likely despite what all the paleoarcheologists claim?
