If the theory of evolution were truth, shouldn't all findings in the fossil record be proofs for evolution?
Why would evolutionists go as far as to falsify findings to try to prove their theory?
The theoretical process of evolution, teaches that Every living thing is in a constant state of change, and adaption; gaining new functional anatomy and losing anatomy over time: Ultimately leading to New Kinds of animals.
However, the fossil record does not show this to be true; in fact, the fossil record Proves this is false, and the theory of evolution could not possibly be a Sufficient Explanation of the Evidence within the fossil record: Given the fossil record shows all the modern animals unchanged going back tens and some cases hundreds of millions of years, anatomically unchanged, and that the animals which are around today in the modern world, look exactly the way they have the entire time they’ve existed on this planet.
Magic evolution theory = animals gain new functional anatomy via mutation of their genome, naturally through reproduction over time.
Reality = animals can only gain or lose functional anatomy that they already possess within their genome, naturally through reproduction over time.
Mutation and adaption are both observable; an animal like a cat or dog or a bear may change color, size, and thickness of skin over time; but, they will always remain cats dogs and bears... that's called observable truth,
Observable truth is not theory, it's called science people! : )
Given speciation has never been observed occurring in nature, or in the fossil record, and all the fossils of animals in the fossil record contain the Same Anatomy their Modern Versions do Today; the theoretical process of evolution, is obviously not the means by which all the Various Species of animals came to exist in the Modern World.
Some animals have gotten smaller or bigger over time, but they remain the same animals... a good example of this is the giant dragon flies found in the fossil record.
That is why evolution is an obvious lie, and not based on the Observable Evidence, and why it remains a theory; and, not a scientific theory by any means, given science is Observable truth.
Evolution and Atheism are both religions, they can only be Believed in and never have been proven, because of the non-existence of evidence for them. Given the Evidence we have (fossil record) Speaks against Atheism, and Evolution; it becomes obvious they are both false Doctrines that should be tossed out, and not believed by any thinking individual whatsoever, who prefers to keep his Thoughts and Beliefs based in reality.
=M=
==============================
When it comes to mutations, anatomy is gained all the time, but it always seems to be something which is already included in a genome.
Examples:
https://www.google.com/search?q=ani...hXCpFkKHX2MB1AQ_AUoAXoECBEQAQ&biw=320&bih=446
Did you know that snakes have the information for legs in their genome? But, they lost their legs sometime over time...
The Bible says God cursed the snake and took its legs away... so, the genome was changed to shut off the formation of their legs...
Interestingly; though it's a rare mutation, the leg formation gene within the snake’s genome is turned back on:
http://craftynewscritter.com/outlandish-animals-existed/
It's interesting the Bible says snakes used to have legs, and a rare mutation as we've seen today reactivates legs in snakes, right?
Which means their genome does indeed have information for legs, but it is inactive...
If evolution were true, what would be the possible advantage snakes would lose their legs...?
Silly snakes! Stop having such negative mutations; and proving evolution theory wrong all on your own!!! (Said Arthur Brain)
There are three forces that we currently know about which can cause mutation within the genome of a creature; reproduction caused mutation, chemical caused mutation (teenage mutant ninja turtles), and radiation caused mutation of a genome. Generally, when we mutate things in a lab environment we use chemicals on a baby creature to cause all sorts of mutation; radiation, however is the future of controlled mutation. With controlled mutation we can direct the changing of a genome. Once we are good enough at it, we will be able to use computers that direct mutations via radiation, to change already existing genomes to give a goat, say, three horns instead of two... or, we could even make a unicorn goat!!! That would be sweet!
We will be able to add or take away already existing functional anatomy that exists within the genome.
Eventually, we will be good enough at genetic manipulation to take a portion of a genome from one animal, and place that information into another animal, to give it new functional anatomy. This new anatomy would only be functional anatomy that already exists in nature; we will have to come quite a bit further than that before we actually start to construct new never before seen functional anatomy, however.
I mean, it’s pretty hard to think of some form of appendage, or some anatomical functional mechanism (eyes, ears, gills) God has not already displayed in nature.
The problem with mutation is that eventually animals, or species of animals more, begin to have problems reproducing: for example the Panda Bear.
Humans themselves are also beginning to have reproductive issues, and will eventually no longer be able to procreate; leading us to rely fully on artificial insemination, which will eventually also fail to function: all thanks to mutation through reproduction over Time...
Yet, this same force of mutation that renders species infertile over time is the very same biological force or vehicle evolutionists want everyone to believe is the process by which all the various species of life came to exist on planet Earth??? What!?!
Why would evolutionists go as far as to falsify findings to try to prove their theory?
The theoretical process of evolution, teaches that Every living thing is in a constant state of change, and adaption; gaining new functional anatomy and losing anatomy over time: Ultimately leading to New Kinds of animals.
However, the fossil record does not show this to be true; in fact, the fossil record Proves this is false, and the theory of evolution could not possibly be a Sufficient Explanation of the Evidence within the fossil record: Given the fossil record shows all the modern animals unchanged going back tens and some cases hundreds of millions of years, anatomically unchanged, and that the animals which are around today in the modern world, look exactly the way they have the entire time they’ve existed on this planet.
Magic evolution theory = animals gain new functional anatomy via mutation of their genome, naturally through reproduction over time.
Reality = animals can only gain or lose functional anatomy that they already possess within their genome, naturally through reproduction over time.
Mutation and adaption are both observable; an animal like a cat or dog or a bear may change color, size, and thickness of skin over time; but, they will always remain cats dogs and bears... that's called observable truth,
Observable truth is not theory, it's called science people! : )
Given speciation has never been observed occurring in nature, or in the fossil record, and all the fossils of animals in the fossil record contain the Same Anatomy their Modern Versions do Today; the theoretical process of evolution, is obviously not the means by which all the Various Species of animals came to exist in the Modern World.
Some animals have gotten smaller or bigger over time, but they remain the same animals... a good example of this is the giant dragon flies found in the fossil record.
That is why evolution is an obvious lie, and not based on the Observable Evidence, and why it remains a theory; and, not a scientific theory by any means, given science is Observable truth.
Evolution and Atheism are both religions, they can only be Believed in and never have been proven, because of the non-existence of evidence for them. Given the Evidence we have (fossil record) Speaks against Atheism, and Evolution; it becomes obvious they are both false Doctrines that should be tossed out, and not believed by any thinking individual whatsoever, who prefers to keep his Thoughts and Beliefs based in reality.
=M=
==============================
When it comes to mutations, anatomy is gained all the time, but it always seems to be something which is already included in a genome.
Examples:
https://www.google.com/search?q=ani...hXCpFkKHX2MB1AQ_AUoAXoECBEQAQ&biw=320&bih=446
Did you know that snakes have the information for legs in their genome? But, they lost their legs sometime over time...
The Bible says God cursed the snake and took its legs away... so, the genome was changed to shut off the formation of their legs...
Interestingly; though it's a rare mutation, the leg formation gene within the snake’s genome is turned back on:
http://craftynewscritter.com/outlandish-animals-existed/
It's interesting the Bible says snakes used to have legs, and a rare mutation as we've seen today reactivates legs in snakes, right?
Which means their genome does indeed have information for legs, but it is inactive...
If evolution were true, what would be the possible advantage snakes would lose their legs...?
Silly snakes! Stop having such negative mutations; and proving evolution theory wrong all on your own!!! (Said Arthur Brain)
There are three forces that we currently know about which can cause mutation within the genome of a creature; reproduction caused mutation, chemical caused mutation (teenage mutant ninja turtles), and radiation caused mutation of a genome. Generally, when we mutate things in a lab environment we use chemicals on a baby creature to cause all sorts of mutation; radiation, however is the future of controlled mutation. With controlled mutation we can direct the changing of a genome. Once we are good enough at it, we will be able to use computers that direct mutations via radiation, to change already existing genomes to give a goat, say, three horns instead of two... or, we could even make a unicorn goat!!! That would be sweet!
We will be able to add or take away already existing functional anatomy that exists within the genome.
Eventually, we will be good enough at genetic manipulation to take a portion of a genome from one animal, and place that information into another animal, to give it new functional anatomy. This new anatomy would only be functional anatomy that already exists in nature; we will have to come quite a bit further than that before we actually start to construct new never before seen functional anatomy, however.
I mean, it’s pretty hard to think of some form of appendage, or some anatomical functional mechanism (eyes, ears, gills) God has not already displayed in nature.
The problem with mutation is that eventually animals, or species of animals more, begin to have problems reproducing: for example the Panda Bear.
Humans themselves are also beginning to have reproductive issues, and will eventually no longer be able to procreate; leading us to rely fully on artificial insemination, which will eventually also fail to function: all thanks to mutation through reproduction over Time...
Yet, this same force of mutation that renders species infertile over time is the very same biological force or vehicle evolutionists want everyone to believe is the process by which all the various species of life came to exist on planet Earth??? What!?!
Last edited:
