Democrat fear if Roe v Wade is overturned: Poor babies will no longer be killed

[marke]

Democrats claim to be supporters of the poor and supporters of blacks, but democrats want poor babies and black babies killed so society will not be burdened with them. Democrats get those thoughts from the devil.

CNN Complains That Children of Poor People Won't be Killed in Abortions if Roe v. Wade Overturned - LifeNews.com

Abortion supporters are once again pushing the distorted notion that one of the best way to help poor families is to abort their unborn children. The argument is at the forefront of Congressional Democrats’ plans to push through a massively unpopular spending bill to force taxpayers to fund...

www.lifenews.com

Abortion supporters are once again pushing the distorted notion that one of the best way to help poor families is to abort their unborn children.
The argument is at the forefront of Congressional Democrats’ plans to push through a massively unpopular spending bill to force taxpayers to fund abortions, and it is being used as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to hear a major abortion case in October.
Basically, the argument is that poor women need access to abortions to thrive.
A new CNN article about the Mississippi case focused around this claim, beginning with the headline, “Poorest Americans could see biggest impact of reversing Roe v. Wade.” It cited statistics from the pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute estimating that about 75 percent of abortion patients are poor women and pointed to Mississippi’s high poverty rate.

 

[ok doser]

75 percent of abortion patients are poor women ...

No

Half of them are girls

Sexually active children

AKA societally acceptable pedophilia

 

[marke]

No

Half of them are girls

Margaret Sanger desired to weed the poor, the criminal, the mentally handicapped, and blacks from society for everyone else's supposed good.

What Margaret Sanger Really Said About Eugenics and Race

Was she the racist that some allege?

time.com

“We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members,” she wrote. It was, as the Washington Post called it, an “inartfully written” sentence, but one that, in context, describes the sort of preposterous allegations she feared — not her actual mission. The irony is that it has been used to propagate those very allegations. Cruz’s letter to the director of the National Portrait Gallery, for example, quotes only the first half of the sentence.