Colorado March For Life!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Colorado March For Life!

This is the show from Friday January 22nd, 2010.

SUMMARY:

* Historic March for Life: The Personhood Movement established its dominance within the pro-life movement across the nation. Guest host Doug McBurney reports on the Denver March for Life featuring Eduardo Verastegui, Keith Mason, Jim Shaddix, Lori Goebel, Maria Lancaster, Joe Roccobono, Gualberto Garcia Jones. Leslie Hanks, Tony Funderburk & Without Shoes, (the band)

* The Personhood Movement Has Exploded Into 40 States! So please help the state personhood efforts get the signatures they need to re-criminalize abortion! If you live in:

Colorado: could you help circulate the Personhood Colorado & Colorado RTL 2010 petition? If so, just click or call 303-753-9394.
California: please visit the CA Human Life Amendment site to get a petition and start collecting signature for the Lord and for the innocent child!
Any Other State: If you live in any other state, can you help to advance personhood via the 2010 ballot or in one of three different ways?
We all need your help!

Today's Resource : When you get Michael and Debi Pearl's best-selling short book, To Train Up a Child, from BEL, you For many years now, whenever anyone orders this book from BEL, we send with it an audio-taped message from Bob Enyart titled Tyrant Dad!
 

Turbo

Caped Crusader
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
so what do you do when the Supreme Court finds personhood unconstitutional?

"When?" Not "if?"

If you're so confident that the Republican Supreme Court appointees are anti-personhood, why do you constantly promote electing Republicans who promise to appoint more of the same?

Do you think personhood is unconstitutional?


If personhood were truly unconstitutional, then the Constitution would need to be amended. But it isn't.

Now, that doesn't mean the Supreme Court would judge rightly on the matter. After all, abortion is unconstitutional, yet we had Roe v. Wade because the (mostly Republican) Court at that time denied the personhood of unborn. Republican appointee Justice Harry Blackmun, wrote the majority opinion for Roe v. Wade:
"The appellee and certain [pro-lifers] argue that the fetus is a 'person' within the language and meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment. In support of this, they outline at length and in detail the well-known facts of fetal development. If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant's case, of course, collapses, for the fetus' right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the [14th] Amendment."​
So let's go about establishing the personhood of the unborn. Do you oppose this strategy? If so, why?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top