Turning the other cheek did not stop the abuse.
Last edited:
chrysostom’s 2015 annual awards
- Thread starter chrysostom
- Start date
Right ... which makes you a hypocrite and a liar. Thanks for the confirmation.
I should thank you for proving my points succinctly in an out of context hateful retort.
are they still evaluating the two posts I reported?
still open for nominations and discussion
Surely no one can doubt that.
You tell him.
lain: Better yet, give that trouble maker the Sophist award. :first: That'll show him...
So I hate underestimating anyone, but I completely missed this on chrys' part.
First, I know by inference in an earlier remark that he noted another poster got in trouble after altering a quote with the "Fixed that for you" tag (though it's unclear if that long time practice where noted for sarcastic and satirical purposes is now off limits or if the particular poster in question had simply run the string on a series of non responsive posts and insults) and chrys saw an opportunity in my:
Here's the clever part. First he asked me to do what he knows I'd be disinclined to do:
Then, hedging his bet to make my consideration less likely he follows with a thing meant to make it a point of admission if I were to accept it.
I've inadvertently thwarted the effort at the end. Too bad/end of story? No, not quite. Because chrys has one more up his sleeve as he writes and places together, answering himself:
Now that's clever. Because my leaving it as corrected (at that point) will be a de facto admission of his charge of misquoting/dishonesy attending bit. And, still not seeing it, I do the obvious and predictable thing and revert the altered bit to its original.
Now he complains.
Like I said, clever should be noted and this effort on his part merits his own award without a second place within eye line.
Impressive.
First, I know by inference in an earlier remark that he noted another poster got in trouble after altering a quote with the "Fixed that for you" tag (though it's unclear if that long time practice where noted for sarcastic and satirical purposes is now off limits or if the particular poster in question had simply run the string on a series of non responsive posts and insults) and chrys saw an opportunity in my:
Here's the clever part. First he asked me to do what he knows I'd be disinclined to do:
Then, hedging his bet to make my consideration less likely he follows with a thing meant to make it a point of admission if I were to accept it.
I've inadvertently thwarted the effort at the end. Too bad/end of story? No, not quite. Because chrys has one more up his sleeve as he writes and places together, answering himself:
Now that's clever. Because my leaving it as corrected (at that point) will be a de facto admission of his charge of misquoting/dishonesy attending bit. And, still not seeing it, I do the obvious and predictable thing and revert the altered bit to its original.
Now he complains.
Like I said, clever should be noted and this effort on his part merits his own award without a second place within eye line.
Impressive.
doth thou not protest too much?
thanks to me it is now okay to misquote at tol
I may be wrong
as bybee said
they are evaluating it
so
go ahead and misquote without fear of reprisal
even though
it is still a dishonest and immature thing to do
your friends have got your back
thanks to me it is now okay to misquote at tol
I may be wrong
as bybee said
they are evaluating it
so
go ahead and misquote without fear of reprisal
even though
it is still a dishonest and immature thing to do
your friends have got your back
No, I dothn't.
But it's like beauty or that enormous plank protruding from you, all in the eye.What you're calling misquoting has long been a staple around here and is little more than sarcasm/satire. I'm generally heavy handed about making sure people understand that, always going beyond the "Fixed that for you" and noting by italics or bold precisely what I'm altering for effect.
And your report of AB was just a spiteful, small slap by you at something that didn't attempt to represent a point you made at all.
I've asked on the point so as to clarify whether or not that, again, long practiced particular is out of play and it isn't. The poster on point had been disruptive on an unrelated and simply run out the string.
Neither true nor particularly Swift of you, but unsurprising.
Your last line of defense, no matter what. You can't be wrong, only less popular and victimized.
lain:
misquoting is dishonest and immature
it is also fallacious
and
even clever for your non thinking friends
it is also fallacious
and
even clever for your non thinking friends
misquoting is not an argumentation skill
it is just a means of baiting your opponent
did you think about that?
But you find lying about other anti-abortion advocates being baby killers as honest and mature?
well
at least you don't misquote me
yet
I wonder if bybee will be by to update us on the evaluation process for reported posts
Right ... and the way you show your appreciation is by referring to me as a babykiller ... which you know is a flat out lie.
how do I know that?
still open for nominations and discussion
how does anyone know that you are against abortion?
I support a party that says they are against abortion
I support a party that passes laws restricting abortion
I support a party that tried to defund planned parenthood
I support a party that gives us conservative judges that do not support abortion
is that enough?