Why?
chrysostom’s 2015 annual awards
- Thread starter chrysostom
- Start date
Why?
If this continues through Thanksgiving I want a leg. :chew:
lain:
It's August, and this thread is still going?
Well, it's crawling around a bit. A little over a hundred posts in the last ten days. Forty of them were from chrys. :idunno:
Or lock and erase embarrassing threads. But then, he doesn't have stalkers either, so...noticed you fade into the woodwork after the Liberace bit. Wasn't surprised.Its not like Chrys would lock it down
New award possibility? Reset's in Pieces award, to the most consistently self destructive poster around the joint.
Don't you just know we are trying to keep the numbers up?
town should understand that
rainee
New member
Hi,
I don't want to be self deprecating but I'm slow, it's hard for me to get back to things before they are already up and gone or the entire subject matter has evolved into something totally different on a thread.
Sigh.
So I thank Chrys!
I can tell when she needs another positive rep
rainee
New member
Well thank you!
But... Well why should they pick on you?
And if this going on makes someone hungry for some bizarre reason - they can always go to Lee Ho Fooks!
Are you illustrating irony or have you moved up the happy hour these days?
From the bar tab?
You should consider an "Invisible Ham" award.
Two posts later...
Seven posts later...
lain: I'm sensing a disturbance in the farce.
Almost never touch the stuff. Too much Irish in the ancestry. I was riding around one day between classes as an undergrad, alone and with a bottle in one hand when it occurred to me that I might have the makings of a problem.
And that was that, excepting the odd libation and never more than two with a meal.
God made liquor so the irish would not rule the world
God made beer so the germans could
no wonder we don't get along
How do Germans tie their shoes?
With little knotsies.
lain:We've gotten along for long stretches. We may again. I don't particularly care for acrimony in relation to anyone. But there are lines that, when crossed, are going to get a strong response from me, one calculated to get the same level or irritation from you. I don't tend to dwell on the negative, so I'm easy to get along with no matter how we weren't before. But you already know that.
A German walks into a library.
German: I'd like a few books on war, please.
Librarian: I'm sorry, I can't check those out to you.
German: Why?
Librarian: You'd lose them.
Last edited:
The operative word being should.
you don't seem to understand what I am doing here
I am here to defend
the baby
the family
the church
religion
you don't seem to understand the democrats are destroying all four
just look at the four liberals on the supreme court
they are there because of clinton and obama
You're doing what a great many are: advancing your favorite flags. And there's nothing wrong with that, inherently. It's mostly what the place facilitates. But how you go about that is important.
I believe you believe everything you're advancing in that particular. I also believe that you're so entrenched in your own jot and tittles that you undermine your own interests without seeming to realize it.
Rather, I don't agree with your assessment. I think characterizing this Court as liberal isn't an objectively true judgment. It's been a mixed bag. I also think you keep ignoring the fact that one of the worst decisions in the history of the Court was made by a Court that was primarily constituted by the very party you tell us is the answer to it.
Republicans stacked the Roe Court. And if your defense of "liberals made them compromise" comes in then you have to understand that's not changing. People aren't more conservative today than they were then. You want to change Roe you keep changing people. We've been through this.
exactly
and
your argument is to bring up what happened over forty years ago
wake up
take a look at what is happening now