No, Paul is proof against that.did the apostles end in the old covenant , with the 12 apostles ?
What about it?what abut Eph 4:11 ??
and Eph 4:11 says that there are apostles today and Paul says there is !!No, Paul is proof against that.
What about it?
No, it doesn't.and Eph 4:11 says that there are apostles today
No, he doesn't.and Paul says there is !!
Prove your point!prove me wrong !!
I will start with Eph 4 :1-32 it is Paul says in verse 12 with a view to equipping of the saints for the service , for workNo, it doesn't.
No, he doesn't.
Prove your point!
Yes, Christ already chose Paul before Paul wrote any scripture. So I still don't see your point.I will start with Eph 4 :1-32 it is Paul says in verse 12 with a view to equipping of the saints for the service , for work
of the ministry for building up the body of Christ .
# 2 verse 11 , and He gave // didomi , a verb , in the aorist tense , means Christ has already done it , active voice , means
Again, I don't get your what your issue is.it was Christ that put it into action , and is in the indictive mood , means you better believe it , and has done this action
singular , and will never be done again . so read the text again !!
DuhPaul wrote Ephesians to the body of Christ and not to Israel !!
#1 Apostle //apostolos just means messengerYes, Christ already chose Paul before Paul wrote any scripture. So I still don't see your point.
(Also, Christ did this [chose Paul] AFTER His earthly was done).
Again, I don't get your what your issue is.
Duh
Sorry, Dan... I cannot follow your thinking because you do not communicate well in English.#1 Apostle //apostolos just means messenger
# 2 evangelist // evaggelistes , means one who brings good news
# 3 prophet // prophetes is one who speaks a divine message
# 4 pastor // poimen is a shepherd
# 5 teacher // didaskolo is an instructor
# 6 and if did not have the above and only had Paul ??
# 7 verse says , with a view to the equipping of the saints for for service for work of the ministry for building
up the body of Christ !! dud !!
dan p
and ok with me !!Sorry, Dan... I cannot follow your thinking because you do not communicate well in English.
It shouldn't be, as I'm pretty sure that I'm not the only one.and ok with me !!
so be it !!It shouldn't be, as I'm pretty sure that I'm not the only one.