I think it would be so neat if creationists . . . marked these places where we know the strata formed rapidly and on a digital globe begin to put around the earth where we have evidence like poly-straight fossils where a tree is standing vertically through 7 layers of strata that supposedly were laid down over millions of years and here's this tree in solid rock and so we know that there at that point those layers were laid down rapidly. But if we take that evidence and extrapolate it, follow those strata layers for as far as they go, we might be able to show hard evidence that all the major strata of the world was laid down rapidly by virtually incontrovertible evidence.
Originally posted by Jukia
Well then why don't creationists do just that?
Originally posted by Jukia
Jack: Your response is supposed to mean--what?
Originally posted by Jukia
No, sorry I do not know what it means.
and you would give me the boot when I am just suggesting that creationists proceed as suggested to get more evidence?
I will admit to getting frustrated reading over and over again the posts from creationists that simply misstate and misunderstand and always go back to "If the Bible says it, it must be absolutely true" and if I have offended, I apologize but it was out of frustration.
I have suggested many times that creationists ought to just bite the bullet, do the research, get it peer reviewed and publish in respected journals instead of their own house organs.
Seems to me that the suggestion I seconded would go a long way toward that.
Or are you afraid that the evidence will not be there?
If the Bible is so accurate, then you should not be afraid, the evidence will be there and you will be able to uncover it, despite the godless evolutionist conspiracy.
But instead you want to kick me out of here?
Originally posted by One Eyed Jack
Don't play innocent with me. That's especially insulting coming from a lawyer.