Search results

Different layers are not consistent with different long ages. Different layers are consistent with, in geological timescales, a single event. We know this is true of the layers because of polystrate fossils aren't confined to a small percentage of the Joggins formation. Or the whale fossil...

Hola

You make a good point. Although I don't think the current leadership in Iran is that crazy, there are some there that are that crazy and there could be regime that crazy in the future.

Ok... so... you aren't even trying. Have a nice day, I guess.

You first have to show you can give the evidence a fair hearing. Tell me the contrary evidence you know about so far.

Because water is more fluid than sediments, and sediments fall (and spread) when fast moving water slows down. In other words, because the earth was covered with sediment laden water, that's all there was to land on when the water left a "blank spot" sometimes.

I'm not sure tidal wave is the right word, but it's the closest thing we have to describe what was happening during a one time global event. But in vast areas of the world the depth of the water was very shallow relative to lakes and oceans we have today. And the water was moving a lot, quite a...

:LOL::ROFLMAO::D:LOL: The confirmation bias is strong with this one. Your statement is so woefully uniformed it can only be because you actively avoid any honest discussion of the topic.

That the ark frequently was sitting on bare sediments before the next wave came along and floated the ark again.

What? Tracks in sediments also show the flood was global. I'm not getting your point. And other verses show the ark landed and floated throughout the flood. It isn't contradictory with these verses.

Except the footprints of humans in dinosaur footprints and visa versa.

That's not quite right. It wasn't an ocean covering the earth for 150 days. It was more like tidal waves, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and wild animals constantly for 150 days. No cover, no resources, no place to go, no agriculture, and no large groups of related people for about a year. We...

That's some pretty good equipment!

Doesn't he mention similar views about Iran?

Although I don't see Iranian leadership as anything but evil, I think they would be ok with stopping at nuclear power. They are crazy, but not use-nukes-for-no-reason crazy.

I'm not so sure a cabal that is working toward a one world government wouldn't want nuclear war. And that doesn't seem very nice to me. And if it works once, they will see it as an option again if things don't go as planned. And things never go as planned. As far as man caused global warming is...

There is a great deal of functionality that is used in development and then no longer, but those sets of instructions are critical to making a viable fully functioning adult. Then there is a great deal of code that is either redundant or used during unusual times. And then there is code that we...

It doesn't matter if there is and intelligent person sending a message. Message systems for the most part don't have an intelligent person directly sending a message. It is by definition a messaging system and therefore includes all the parts of a messaging system. Those parts include a sender...

I heard it from Doctor Robert Carter. He has written about it in more complete terms. But I'm a Layman so I thought that it would be enough for me to just understand what he wrote about from his lectures

It might be fair to say that a king has to put his name on whatever ultimately happens by necessity if there is no committee. Therefore I think a king would even invite having a committee that had control over him because if he were aligned with the committee then he always has cover for evil...