Search results

Profoundly misleading, of course. As you often do, you illicitly frame the entire issue in a deeply misleading way. Here, you remain entirely silent on the matter of the risks associated with not taking the vaccine.

Liar. The US government never represented either that (a) booster shots would not be needed; or (b) that the vaccines are 100% effective.

Liar.

How does showing that cases are going up in a vaxxed population - and Israel is only about 60% fully vaxxed - prove that the vaccines are not effective? Remember: rising infection rates among the vaccinated could be caused by a dramatic increase in the amount of virus circulating among the...

How does this not make marke's statement a bald-faced lie? It doesn't, of course And why are vaccers so worried about me if they get vaccinated and infected people cannot harm them? We all know that the vaccinated can still get infected - marke is lying when he asserts that infected people...

Where did this lie come from? Straight from marke - post 984 from the "Is there a risk of death from the covid vaccine" thread: What are the present chances of dying from the Delta Variant of covid? Apparently none at all. There is no record of anyone dying from the Delta Variant, making it...

No, I am right. Again, you conveniently re-define words to justify the lie. To say the vaccine is "safe" is not to say it is risk-free - you know this. Example: when people say flying is "safe", they do not mean it carries no risks at all. And there other examples - people will refer to a...

Not this again. It is difficult to believe that people here are really so dumb as to believe that this kind of chart, that you toss about with abandon, demonstrates anything. Here is a question you will not be able to answer: how, precisely, does this chart demonstrate that the vaccines are...

No. When people on the right use the term "open borders" they are implying that the democrats want to grant access to anyone who tries to cross, with very limited exceptions. You are redefining "open borders" to mean "letting people in the democrats can make political points with". To wit: An...

Evasive, and I suspect you know it. First, I never accused the right in general of lying; I said this site is festooned is with lies. Which it obviously is. And there is at least one other serial liar here besides marke. So this element of your reply is a strawman. The fact that I do not know...

The scope of lies at issue was not limited to vaccine passports and Covid. In response to a troll who invited me to leave this site, I posted this: And leave you and your ilk undisturbed as you gather in delight over your witches' brew of lies and conspiratorial fantasies? You, then...

Theory, not established "spot on" established fact. Even granting this one possibility, it is beyond obvious that the "Trump right" in the USA is buying in to a disturbing (and dangerous) range of fantasies.

How? How is it not equivalent? Please address this question head-on. It certainly seems equivalent to me. Please to try to find a flaw in the following reasoning: The Pathogen: - covid is highly contagious - covid can harm the vaccinated The Vaccine: - the vaccine is free - the vaccine is...

Liar. By no reasonable standard is the shot dangerous. You, sir, are an unrepentant serial liar. And, of course, your other point is entirely without merit - employers have the right to fire people who choose to threaten other employees by needlessly not taking the vaccine. If I came to your...

Unlike some others here, I am confident that even though your posting is solely focused on belittling and demeaning other, you know full well that this question you posed is misleading. If you are going to say that you have been hiding out for the last 20 months then, obviously, you have not...

Seriously, take your meds.

Do I really need to explain what is wrong with the implied reasoning here? Suppose there is some remote country with few people who all live in rural settings. The Covid rate may be very low even if no one is vaccinated precisely because there is relatively little close contact with other...

Interesting phrasing - you claim that the case for the vaccine is not irrefutable. And you are right. So? There is not "irrefutable" evidence for many things we accept as true based on the strength of the evidence available to us, even if the case is not "irrefutable".

It is not force - no one will be forced. Will they lose their jobs? Perhaps. Will they be denied non-essential services. Perhaps. So? I will lose my job if I fail to meet conditions of employment - employers have that right. And how can you argue that employers should not have the right to...

Oh my, you just cannot accept the position of the trained experts can you? No, you retreat into a world of fantasy where you deem yourself in a better position to make complex medical judgments than legions of trained experts. There is, for once, something that is very likely true in your...