Search results

You first have to show you can give the evidence a fair hearing. Tell me the contrary evidence you know about so far.

Because water is more fluid than sediments, and sediments fall (and spread) when fast moving water slows down. In other words, because the earth was covered with sediment laden water, that's all there was to land on when the water left a "blank spot" sometimes.

I'm not sure tidal wave is the right word, but it's the closest thing we have to describe what was happening during a one time global event. But in vast areas of the world the depth of the water was very shallow relative to lakes and oceans we have today. And the water was moving a lot, quite a...

:LOL::ROFLMAO::D:LOL: The confirmation bias is strong with this one. Your statement is so woefully uniformed it can only be because you actively avoid any honest discussion of the topic.

That the ark frequently was sitting on bare sediments before the next wave came along and floated the ark again.

What? Tracks in sediments also show the flood was global. I'm not getting your point. And other verses show the ark landed and floated throughout the flood. It isn't contradictory with these verses.

Except the footprints of humans in dinosaur footprints and visa versa.

That's not quite right. It wasn't an ocean covering the earth for 150 days. It was more like tidal waves, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and wild animals constantly for 150 days. No cover, no resources, no place to go, no agriculture, and no large groups of related people for about a year. We...

That's some pretty good equipment!

Doesn't he mention similar views about Iran?

Although I don't see Iranian leadership as anything but evil, I think they would be ok with stopping at nuclear power. They are crazy, but not use-nukes-for-no-reason crazy.

I'm not so sure a cabal that is working toward a one world government wouldn't want nuclear war. And that doesn't seem very nice to me. And if it works once, they will see it as an option again if things don't go as planned. And things never go as planned. As far as man caused global warming is...

There is a great deal of functionality that is used in development and then no longer, but those sets of instructions are critical to making a viable fully functioning adult. Then there is a great deal of code that is either redundant or used during unusual times. And then there is code that we...

It doesn't matter if there is and intelligent person sending a message. Message systems for the most part don't have an intelligent person directly sending a message. It is by definition a messaging system and therefore includes all the parts of a messaging system. Those parts include a sender...

I heard it from Doctor Robert Carter. He has written about it in more complete terms. But I'm a Layman so I thought that it would be enough for me to just understand what he wrote about from his lectures

It might be fair to say that a king has to put his name on whatever ultimately happens by necessity if there is no committee. Therefore I think a king would even invite having a committee that had control over him because if he were aligned with the committee then he always has cover for evil...

In a nutshell it might be fair to say that having an evil committee will perpetuate itself. It will never die it will just become continually more evil as members leave through attrition and new members are added. The overall makeup of the committee will never change, but become continually worse.

Some might have survived the flood, but their lineage didn't continue. We know this because genetically every single human on earth has markers that could be derived from 4 men and 4 women at current mutation rates over about 4k years.

It's not a metaphor. It's an example. Who told you the message system in the body, especially DNA from one generation to the next, wasn't a message system? The only way that could happen is to redefine "message system". So tell us your definition. LOL. What? :ROFLMAO::LOL: Just how much of...

The only large upswings we see come at the cost of less potential variation.