Search results

On a lighter note, here's an audio skit from a vinyl recording Bill Cosby did in 1965 on Noah and the Ark. 8 minutes My favorite line .... "Have you looked down there? Who's gonna clean up that mess down there?!"

I don't recall that. If all fish died in the flood then God had to create more. Seeds could. But we have a dove coming back with an olive leaf. So at least one olive tree survived the flood.

There might have been some areas where the water was too hot or toxic for fish to survive. But it couldn't have been all areas since there was fish that survived. The vegetation would be another thing to ponder. Completely under water for a long time. I don't know how long all the vegetation...

Wish I was there to witness how it happened. I have no idea if all the water that caused the flood preexisted. I lean towards the waters coming from below (fountains of the deep bursting open) and above (the windows of heaven and/or the storehouses mentioned in scripture) which would mean the...

The discussion veered into science lining up with scripture, so no it's not mixing apples and walruses. There are several supernatural events in scripture that do not line up with science. If you want to believe the flood was not a supernatural event it's OK by me, but don't begrudge me for...

Then make science line up with a supernatural virgin birth.

I don't have a problem with any anyone making assumptions as long as it is realized as assumption, because assumptions of how an event took place are not evidence.

Ones that don't try to make science line up with scripture.

As a miracle apart from natural law, yes. As per natural law it is not. In other words, science does not match scripture in that case, so I don't try to make science and scripture match up.

BiNGO! It's amazing how people are being portrayed as if questioning the hydroplate theory equates to questioning scripture and God.

Everyone does, based on what each of us thinks is "reason". To some a virgin birth would not be reason, but to others it is.

They could applaud the hypothesis of the hydroplate theory if it did not have scientific flaws and still not believe it proves the existence of God. So their religious beliefs (or lack of) would not hinder the research. One would think they would applaud it if they felt it had enough merit...

Yeppers. For a balanced view one should hear the objections the scientific community has towards the hydroplate theory.

If the hydroplate theory was scientifically legit it wouldn't cause the primarily atheistic scientific community to believe in God, so they would have no underlying agenda to reject the data if it was scientifically legit.

Does the scientific community applaud their explanation?

Well I know I am! Wonder what it's expanding into? When scripture talks about God spreading out things like unrolling a scroll, perhaps it is still ongoing.

Don't want to get too far off topic of this thread, but when it comes to scripture the majority on this site have differing viewpoints as to what is to be taken literally or figuratively; and everybody thinks the others are stupid for their viewpoint. So you can't really say that flat earth is...

Hold on a second. I heard that scientist found that the universe is expanding away from us (earth) at the same speed in all directions. How would that be possible unless earth was central? We are getting lots of differing viewpoints in this thread. Flat earthers should be just as welcome. You...

Could be just as plausible as anything else I've heard. Hope God has video of how it went down that we can watch someday. hehe!

I'm trying to picture what you mean by "felling of the Tree of the Knowledge" to try and visualize how it connects to the flooding of the earth. Sure. Speculation is welcome as far as I'm concerned!