"Sexual slavery" is actually technically inaccurate, since its not like the contract in question would actually be enforceable when the child became an adult or even if the parents got into a better financial system. "Systematic rape" would probably make more sense.
I do not support Walter's position on that issue, at all. I support a lot of what Block says, but I do not agree with that at all.
I'm not exactly sure what your point is here. I assume it has something to do with the fact that I called Nick evil? I don't see what Walter Block has to do with anything. And, considering he's an atheist, he's currently evil as well. I happen to agree with him politically a lot, but he's still going to burn in Hell for all eternity if he doesn't accept Jesus Christ as his Lord and Savior.
That said, the fact that an atheist like Block supports significantly, SIGNIFICANTLY less evil than a "Christian" like Nick amazes me.
I don't know where you stand on foreign policy, but if you support any war the US has been in since 1812 and you're trying to trip Block up on this, you need to take the plank out of your own eye. Considering how we've been conditioned, its easy to see the murder of thousands by "Murder Inc." (Government, particularly the US government in this case) as a minor thing compared to the thought that someone could POSSIBLY theorize that rape might be a better alternative than murder in the rare scenario that it comes down to it. Again, I don't believe Block would take the same position if he were a Christian, but you need to look at who the real enemies of life and liberty are here. I'll give you a hint, an ancap professor who has no chance in Hell of getting any of his ideas passed is not the issue here.
Spend more time bashing the people who are about to ACTUALLY get thousands, tens of thousands, maybe even hundreds of thousands of people killed in Syria.